Deb Michaels
Deb Michaels
10:00am - 3:00pm
The Midday Show
Request A Song
My Profile
  Toll Free: 1-800-585-3515 Friday August 01, 2014  
Infinite Menus, Copyright 2006, OpenCube Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Carroll Broadcasting
WKJC FM 104.7 - Tawas
WIOS AM 1480 - Tawas
HIT'S 103.3 FM - Tawas
HIT'S 94.9 FM - Alpena





If you Missed

Sunrise Side Today, just click on the Podcast Button

Above!


Where to Go...

& What to Do...

in N.E. Michigan!




Click on Tawas Lighthouse




Political News
Subscribe To This Feed

ItÂ’s Been 2,401 Days Since Hillary Clinton Visited Iowa


US State Department(WASHINGTON) -- At this point in the presidential cycle, virtually anybody even thinking about running for president has racked up frequent flier miles going back-and-forth to Iowa and New Hampshire.

Senators Rand Paul and Ted Cruz have already made a combined 10 trips to Iowa since the last election. Democrats too -- Vice President Joe Biden, as well as Martin O’Malley and Amy Klobucher, have visited. Even Sen. Bernie Sanders has made two trips each to Iowa and New Hampshire.

But the most formidable candidate of all hasn’t been to either state in ages. Hillary Clinton has not set foot in Iowa since she came in third in the Iowa caucuses on Jan. 4, 2008 -- 2,401 days ago.

And it appears the former Secretary of State hasn't made a public appearance in New Hampshire since she won the 2008 New Hampshire primary -- 2,397 days ago.

At least some in Iowa are starting to feel neglected. Last month, the Iowa Gazette practically begged Clinton to visit.

“We’ve watched as you have flexed your muscles on the international stage and have been impressed with your ability to connect,” the Gazette editorialized. “But as Iowans, we need to see that connection in action. Our hope, if you are really considering a 2016 run, is that you have learned from your experience and come to Iowa intent on having true conversations about what matters to our state and the fine people in it.”

Mrs. Clinton’s Hard Choices book tour has brought her all over the country, but has stayed clear of the early presidential primary states. No book signings or speeches in Iowa or New Hampshire. None in South Carolina, either.

It’s a measure of just how different a candidate Hillary Clinton will be -- so formidable, such an overwhelming favorite, so thoroughly well-known -- that she apparently doesn’t need to worry about laying the groundwork for a campaign in the early states.

But in urging Mrs. Clinton to visit the Hawkeye state, the Iowa Gazette sought to remind Mrs. Clinton that she also kept clear of Iowa back when she was the overwhelming frontrunner early in the 2008 presidential cycle.

“Mistakes were made -- frankly, too many to list here -- but chief above them all was the steadfast refusal of the Clinton campaign to honor the tradition of visiting the early states,” the Gazette editorialized, urging her to start engaging Iowa voters. “We’d suggest sooner rather than later this time.”

ABC News reached out to Clinton’s spokesman Nick Merrill to ask why she's steered clear of the states to which virtually every other potential candidate has been flocking, and to see if she has any plans to visit those states any time soon, but we did not get a response.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

Bill Clinton, Hours Before 9/11 Attacks: 'I Could Have Killed' Osama bin Laden


ABC News(NEW YORK) -- Hours before the 9/11 terrorist attacks, former U.S. President Bill Clinton told an audience in Australia about his missed chance to kill mastermind Osama bin Laden, according to audio released this week.

Clinton was speaking at a business meeting in Melbourne when the topic turned to terrorism.

“And I’m just saying, you know, if I were Osama bin Laden…He’s a very smart guy. I spent a lot of time thinking about him. And I nearly got him once,” Clinton said in the audio, which was recorded by former Liberal Party head Michael Kroger and aired by Sky News.

“I nearly got him. And I could have killed him, but I would have had to destroy a little town called Kandahar in Afghanistan and kill 300 innocent women and children, and then I would have been no better than him."

“And so I didn’t do it.”

Hours after Clinton spoke, a hijacked Boeing 767 slammed into the north tower of New York City’s World Trade Center. A second plane struck the south tower 18 minutes later. Other planes crashed in Washington, D.C. and western Pennsylvania. The attacks, organized by bin Laden, killed more than 3,000 people.

Bin Laden, who headed the terrorist group al Qaeda, had been targeted by authorities due to his role in the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya.

Clinton’s statements referred to a proposed strike in December 1998, after intelligence indicated that bin Laden was staying at the governor’s residence in Kandahar. That proposed attack was addressed in the 9/11 Commission Report, released in 2004.

According to the report, the missed chance made some lower-level officials angry, but later intelligence appeared to show that bin Laden had left his quarters.

“The principals’ wariness about ordering a strike appears to have been vindicated: bin Laden left his room unexpectedly, and if a strike had been ordered he would not have been hit,” the commission wrote.

U.S. officials again considered a missile strike against bin Laden in May 1999 -- but as was the case months before, they held back from striking, wary of conflicting intelligence reports. That skepticism may have been bolstered by the CIA’s accidental bombing on the Chinese embassy in Belgrade during the NATO war against Serbia, the commission said.

“This episode may have made officials more cautious than might otherwise have been the case,” the commission’s report states.

From May 1999 until September 2001, authorities did not again actively consider a missile strike against bin Laden.

Bin Laden was eventually killed in a 2011 raid by U.S. Special Forces in Pakistan.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

Senate Republicans Block $2.7 Billion Border-Funding Bill


iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- Senate Republicans blocked a bill Thursday that would provide $2.7 billion in funding to address the crisis of minors from Central America illegally entering the United States.

With 50 yeas and 44 nays, the Senate did not advance Sen. Barbara Mikulski’s, D-Md., proposal to provide funding in response to President Obama’s request. The measure required a 60-vote threshold.

On July 8, the president asked Congress to supply an emergency $3.7 billion to address what members of both parties have deemed a national crisis. That request included $1.1 billion to improve enforcement and detain and return adults accompanying children across the border, plus about $2.2 billion to help Customs and Border Patrol and the Department of Health and Human Services detain, house and care for children after they have crossed.

In response to that request, Mikulski proposed a pared-down $2.7 billion package.

Under Senate rules, all non-emergency funding must include spending offsets, and 44 Republicans voted against waiving those rules and proceeding to a vote on Mikulski's spending package. All 50 Senate Democrats voted to waive budget rules and proceed to vote on the bill.

House Republicans struggled Thursday to corral members for a vote Friday on their own border bill, but the Senate bill's failure ensures that Congress will not send a border measure -- much less the $3.7 billion in funding he requested -- to President Obama's desk before its August recess.

The House will convene for a border vote Friday before leaving town for August recess. After voting late into the night Thursday, the Senate will be in session without holding any votes on Friday, its last day before the month-long break.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

Congress Approves $15 Billion VA Deal


iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- In a rare moment of bipartisan, bicameral unity, Congress has approved a deal to add $15 billion and institute reforms at the Veterans Administration.

The agency has been plagued by scandal; staffers routinely falsified wait times for veterans seeking care, and gamed internal procedures to hide the delays. Dozens of veterans died while reportedly waiting to see doctors.

The scandal resulted in the ouster of former VA Secretary Eric Shinseki.

After the House passed the measure on Wednesday, the Senate followed suit Thursday. The VA deal sailed through two votes: an 86-8 vote to waive budget rules, and a 91-3 vote to pass the bill and send it to President Obama's desk.

After weeks of negotiations, the House and Senate Veterans Affairs Committees this week reached a deal to provide $10 billion in, "mandatory emergency money" to contract health care outside the VA system. An additional $5 billion, offset by spending cuts within the VA, will go to hiring new doctors and nurses. Veterans living more than 40 miles away from a VA facility will be able to obtain care outside the VA network.

On the floor before the final vote, Senate Veterans Affairs Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., thanked Sen. John McCain for intervening and making sure the deal was approached by "serious negotiators."

On Tuesday, the Senate approved Shinseki's replacement, voting 97-0 to confirm former Procter & Gamble CEO Robert McDonald as the next Veterans Affairs secretary.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

Driving While Stoned: Congress Searches for a Test Standard


iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- With the clock ticking down to the congressional recess and amid a day of high drama over how to handle the border crisis, the House of Representatives made time for another matter: "Planes, Trains and Automobiles: Operating While Stoned."

That was the title of a hearing held on Thursday by the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Government Operations, which was reviewing the federal government's response to state-level marijuana legalization as it pertains to transportation policy.

The consensus of experts who testified before the committee was that operating a vehicle under the influence of drugs poses a clear danger to the public, but lawmakers expressed concern that methods to test for marijuana are not up to date -- and neither is the science.

"We don't have a uniform standard," said Rep. Gerry Connolly, D-Va. "The variable is much greater than that of other controlled substances such as alcohol. We actually can’t scientifically pinpoint levels of impairment with any accuracy."

"We would all concede there's some impairment for some period of time, but it's very variable, and we're not quite sure yet -- sure enough to adopt a uniform standard," he added.

Testing vehicle operators for marijuana is not quite as simple as using a breathalyzer to test for alcohol, officials noted.

Dr. Jeff Michael, associate administrator at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, explained that marijuana does not appear to have a distinct impairment threshold -- such as the .08% blood alcohol content that a breathalyzer can test for. The level of impairment from THC, the active ingredient in marijuana, is much more variable than alcohol, making it harder to gauge, he said.

"Beyond some broad confirmation that high levels of THC are associated with higher levels of impairment, a more precise association of THC levels and degrees of impairment are not yet available," Michael said during the hearing.

Rep. John Mica, R-Fla., the chairman of the subcommittee, highlighted a device capable of detecting marijuana within four hours of entering the system. Mica even brought the device into the hearing room.

"I was gonna swab the panelists," the congressman quipped, "but I thought I wouldn't do that today."

"You can take a swab with this —-- and it can tell you if anyone has used marijuana within four hours," Mica noted. "But again, we have no standard. We have no acceptable test. And we have no way of telling if people are impaired. Most of the data we're getting right now is from, again, fatalities."

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

Lawmakers Summoned Back to DC as Border Bill Hangs in Balance


Alex Wong/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- Cancel that flight, congressman.

Lawmakers departing on Thursday for their annual August recess are now being told “not so fast” after the House Republican leadership pulled a $659 million bill to address the ongoing crisis at the southern border.

Several House Republicans told ABC News they were furious about not taking a vote on the bill, and they were pushing for a chance to do so before leaving town.

Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy told lawmakers to stay near the Capitol, suggesting that a vote could still take place on Thursday.

In fact, House Appropriations Chairman Hal Rogers, R-Ky., told ABC News that he was at the airport when he was summoned back to the Capitol for a closed-door GOP meeting.

Rogers said it became clear Thursday morning the conservative defections were growing, but he said he and others believe the House should vote -- up or down -- on immigration.

"I would like to see us have a vote," Rogers said in an interview.

There is an unusual air of uncertainty in the Capitol, mixed with a big dose of dysfunction, as rank-and-file Republicans discuss whether to have a vote on immigration before they go home for August recess.

Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich., told ABC News that he believes lawmakers need to vote. Leaving town without doing so, he said, will be difficult to explain to constituents. He supports the immigration bill.

At issue is a Tea Party revolt that broke out on Thursday among House Republicans inspired by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who urged members late into the night to oppose a bill to approve more money to address the border crisis.

House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, thought he had enough Republican votes for the spending bill, but he canceled a vote after it appeared that was not the case.

Earlier on Thursday, Boehner, along with his Republican colleagues -- Reps. Kevin McCarthy of California, Steve Scalise of Louisiana and Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington state -- issued the following statement on the legislation:

“This situation shows the intense concern within our conference -- and among the American people -- about the need to ensure the security of our borders and the president’s refusal to faithfully execute our laws. There are numerous steps the president can and should be taking right now, without the need for congressional action, to secure our borders and ensure these children are returned swiftly and safely to their countries,” the quartet of lawmakers wrote in a joint statement. “For the past month, the House has been engaged in intensive efforts to pass legislation that would compel the president to do his job and ensure it can be done as quickly and compassionately as possible. Through an inclusive process, a border bill was built by listening to members and the American people that has the support not just of a majority of the majority in the House, but most of the House Republican Conference."

The decision by GOP leaders sparked a counter revolt, and members of Congress say they've rarely seen an afternoon like this.

Of course, even if the House does pass its $659 million border bill, it still faces certain defeat in the Senate.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

CIA Apologizes for Searching Senate Intel Committee Computers


The Central Intelligence Agency(WASHINGTON) -- CIA Director John Brennan has apologized to the leadership of the Senate Intelligence Committee after the CIA’s Inspector General determined that agency officials inappropriately searched the stand-alone computer network used by committee staffers in preparing their report on the CIA’s detention and interrogation program.

Earlier this year, Brennan denied the CIA had illegally monitored the committee’s computers, calling the suggestions as “just beyond the scope of reason.”

To follow up on the Inspector General’s determination, Brennan has ordered the formation of an accountability board to review the incident and make recommendations that could potentially lead to disciplinary action.

The development is the latest twist in a long-running dispute between the CIA and the committee about classified information used to compile the 6,000 page report. The classified report found that the CIA overstated the success of the program and may have misled members of Congress. A declassified summary of the report could be released in a few weeks.

In order for committee staffers to have access to classified materials about the program an agreement was reached in 2009 that allowed them access to documents at a CIA facility in northern Virginia. A standalone computer network, called RDINet, was developed so the staffers could access classified computer files.

In January, Brennan informed committee chairman Sen. Dianne Feinstein and vice-chairman Sen. Saxby Chambliss that the CIA had recently performed a “search” of that network and determined that committee staffers had been given access to files that should not have been on the network. In turn, Feinstein said she believed that the CIA could only have determined that by violating the agreement that the CIA would not have access to the committee’s computer network.

At the time, Brennan referred the dispute to the CIA’s Inspector General.

In a statement released Thursday, CIA spokesman Dean Boyd said the Inspector General’s investigation had judged “that some CIA employees acted in a manner inconsistent with the common understanding reached between SSCI and the CIA in 2009 regarding access to the RDINet.”

“The Director subsequently informed the SSCI Chairman and Vice Chairman of the findings and apologized to them for such actions by CIA officers as described in the OIG report,” said Boyd.

The statement added that Brennan has ordered the establishment of an Accountability Board to be chaired by former senator Evan Bayh who served on the Senate Intelligence Committee. 

“This Board will review the OIG report, conduct interviews as needed, and provide the Director with recommendations that, depending on its findings, could include potential disciplinary measures and/or steps to address systemic issues,” said Boyd.

The dispute became public in March when Feinstein delivered a lengthy and blistering speech on the Senate floor where she expressed “grave concerns” that the CIA had conducted an unauthorized search of the network that violated the 2009 agreement. She also asked the CIA to apologize and recognize that the computer search was inappropriate.

Appearing at a Washington, D.C. think tank the same day as Feinstein’s speech, Brennan denied her accusations, labeling them “beyond the scope of reason” and that “nothing could be further from the truth.” 

“I mean we wouldn’t do that,” Brennan told the Council on Foreign Relations. “I mean that’s just beyond the scope of reason in terms of what we would do.”

On Thursday, Feinstein called Brennan’s apology and his decision to refer the Inspector General report to an accountability board “positive first steps.”

Other Democratic members of the committee were more critical.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) called for Brennan to make a “public apology” and Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) expressed a loss of confidence in Brennan.

“I am concerned about the director’s apparent inability to find any flaws in the agency he leads,” Udall said in a statement. “Earlier this year he referred to the chairman’s and my publicly stated concerns about the CIA search as ‘spurious allegations that are wholly unsupported by facts’ and urged us to ‘refrain from outbursts.’ Brennan needs to account for these statements.” 

Udall said he wants an independent counsel to look into the matter.

Earlier in July, the Justice Department said it had found insufficient evidence to proceed with a criminal probe of Feinstein's and the CIA’s separate allegations.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

How the Monica Lewinsky Scandal Would Be Different Today


Lawrence Lucier/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- Monica Lewinsky is reclaiming her story.

In her second column for Vanity Fair magazine, published online on Thursday, Lewinsky writes about how people who are tarnished in public scandals or who face bullying online have an unprecedented opportunity to defend themselves -- through social media, online essays, and other forms of modern communication.

Using Lewinsky's own advice, we wondered how the scandal involving her and President Bill Clinton may have been different if it happened today:

1) Taking Charge of the Narrative

News of the "Lewinsky scandal" first broke in January 1998, when a relatively new online outlet called the Drudge Report posted a story about a White House intern having a sexual relationship with the president. From there on, Lewinsky was largely defined by a series of characterizations: the woman in the blue dress who performed oral sex on the president.

"More and more I'm finding that those who have lost command of their public narratives, do the opposite. They shake off the assault or the slight, take control of their rightful place in their community or the larger culture, and use social media to return the salvo," Lewinsky wrote. "They refuse to have their identities swindled or misshapen. Instead, they take charge. They turn the attack on its head and use it as an opportunity for self-definition, instead of just taking blood as they go down."

2) Writing an Online Rebuttal

After news of the affair broke, and President Clinton issued a denial referring to Lewinsky as "that woman," the former White House intern escaped the public eye, hiding out at her mother's house. If the scandal happened today, perhaps Lewinsky would have published an essay on the Internet that addressed the her side of things.

"I was listening to NPR's 'All Things Considered.' One segment of the show addressed a trend: 'The Rise of the Online Rebuttal,'" Lewinsky wrote in Vanity Fair, quoting from the NPR segment that explained the rebuttal "allows for people who feel they have been wronged or misrepresented to forcefully answer in their own voice."

3) Using Social Media to Push Back

After remaining silent through the long and very public investigation into her affair with the president, Lewinsky finally participated in a biography written about her and was interviewed by Barbara Walters for an ABC News special in 1999, two traditional forms of media relations. But today, Lewinsky could have direct and immediate access to the millions of Americans reading about her story; she could tweet, Instagram or write lengthy Facebook posts directly to readers.

"[The NPR] report reminded me of a story that had come across my browser in recent days. It concerned a young woman who was not even remotely a public figure until acquaintances began body shaming her. They graffiti'd some rocks on a local beach with ridiculous insults about her rear end," Lewinsky wrote. "She posted a sweet and sassy photo of herself on social media -- a photo taken from behind, peering over one shoulder, grinning."

4) Capitalizing on the Bad in Order to Do Good

Lewinsky has written previously about how she had trouble finding work for years after the Clinton scandal, but she pointed out in the new Vanity Fair essay that people who have been bullied have capitalized on their worst moments by using them as a platform to spread awareness.

"As of this month, [the young woman] has been named an ambassador to ReachOut.com [to help spread the word about the perils of body shaming] and a featured guest blogger for AMightyGirl.com, a Web site that serves as a resource for 'courageous girls,'" Lewinsky wrote. The young woman's father now "hopes that her daughter's story and the ensuing dialogue will help bring real support to people who need it."

5) Looking at the Silver Lining

Lewinsky argues in her essay that perhaps the very things that allow for bullying or negativity could be used for the opposite. If she found herself enmeshed in the Clinton scandal today, perhaps Lewinsky would be able to use those tools to fend off some of the "haters."

"Perhaps it is our access to the subterranean depths of the Internet -- a shadowy medium that exists outside the physical world -- that has allowed us ... to begin to have the means of reclamation," Lewinsky writes. "In [the case of the body shamed young woman], her body-positive photo went viral. An online rebuttal . . . in all meanings. Sounds good to me."

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

Undeterred by Lawsuit, Obama Signs Another Executive Order


The White House(WASHINGTON) -- One day after House Republicans voted to sue him for allegedly exceeding his executive authority, President Obama signed yet another executive order, saying the suit is “not going to stop me from doing what I think needs to be done in order to help families across the country.”

“Any time Congress wants to do work with me to help working families, I'm right there. The door is always open. More than that, I'll go to them; I'll wash their car, walk their dog,” the president joked at a White House ceremony. “I'm ready to work with them any time that they want to pursue policies that help working families. But where they’re doing so little or nothing at all to help working families, then we've got to find ways, as an administration, to take action that's going to help.”

“I said to [House] Speaker [John] Boehner, tell your caucus the best way to avoid me acting on my own is work with me to actually do something. Then you don’t have to worry about it. We’re not going to stop, and if they’re not going to lift a finger to help working Americans then I’m going to work twice as hard to help working Americans,” Obama said.

The president on Thursday signed an order, titled “Fair Pay and Safe Workplace,” requiring prospective federal contractors to disclose labor law violations.

With lawmakers leaving behind a lengthy legislative to-do list as they head out of town, the president quipped that “the big event last night -- it wasn’t the vote on the minimum wage. It wasn’t a vote on immigration reform, strengthening the borders. It wasn’t a vote on family leave. What did they have a vote on? They got together in the House of Representatives, the Republicans, and voted to sue me for taking the actions that we are doing to help families.”

“One of the main objections that’s the basis of this suit is us making a temporary modification to the health care law that they said needed to be modified,” Obama explained. “So they criticized a provision; we modify it to make it easier for business to transition; and that’s the basis for their suit. Now, you could say that, all right, this is a harmless political stunt -- except it wastes America’s time. You guys are all paying for it as taxpayers. It’s not very productive.”

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

Eric Cantor Gives Farewell Speech as House Majority Leader


Alex Wong/Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- Rep. Eric Cantor took to the House floor for the last time as majority leader Thursday, calling his service on Capitol Hill “a privilege of a lifetime.”

“Walking into this building and walking onto this floor is something that excited me every day since I was first elected to Congress,” he said. “As it should. Not one of us should ever take for granted the awesome honor and responsibility we have to serve our fellow Americans.”

Cantor has represented Virginia’s 7th District for 14 years, and his defeat in June by tea party-backed professor Dave Brat stunned Washington.

As he steps down as majority leader, there will be a few changes, notably his Twitter handle, @GOPLeader, and first-class office at the Capitol.

On Tuesday, the House Republicans uploaded a two-minute Cantor tribute video to honor his time as majority leader. But Thursday’s address marked a very public goodbye.

During the 10-minute speech, Cantor continually expressed pride and gratitude that he was able to take part in leading the country, thanking his colleagues, staff, family and Capitol Police.

Cantor recalled a story about his grandparents who had fled religious persecution in Europe, saying his own rise to majority leader served as an example of the American Dream but that the country has seen that “dream erode” in recent years.

He also expressed concern for the country’s education system and employment opportunities, as well as the state of American strength abroad. 

“Instability and terror seem to be coming from every corner of the globe. The Middle East is in chaos, Iran is marching towards a nuclear weapon, Russia has reverted to a Cold War footing and invaded Ukraine,” Cantor said. “America does lead in so many areas, including innovation, scientific discovery, and medicine. But we must also make leadership abroad a priority. I shudder to think what the world looks like in five years for us and our allies if we don’t steel our resolve and stand tall with those who stand with us.”

It wasn’t all dismal news. Cantor said one of his proudest moments in office was when President Obama signed the Gabriella Miller Kids First Research Act, which aimed to find cures and treatments for pediatric diseases.

Cantor ended by thanking three Republicans specifically. He thanked House Speaker John Boehner for his “firm leadership” while “not being afraid to show us all your kind heart and your soft spot from time to time,” to which the chamber erupted in bipartisan laughter.

He also named Budget Chairman Paul Ryan for his commitment to “conservative solutions” and incoming Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy. Both men were referred to as “dear friends.”

Before waving and blowing kisses to a bipartisan standing ovation, Cantor closed his speech in the most appropriate way he knew how, saying, “And with that, I yield back.”

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

State Department Using Facebook for Visa Delay Damage Control


iStock/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- International students and others looking to travel to the United States this fall are concerned about whether glitches in the State Department’s visa processing system will prevent them from getting their travel documents on time -- and have taken to social media to vent.

The system in charge of processing and printing visas has been at least partially down since July 20, and a steady backlog of visa cases means frustrated travelers are looking for answers. For many, the first place they turn is Facebook and, perhaps to their surprise, the State Department is responding.

“I did my F-1 visa interview in Luxembourg on 21st July. However it’s been 10 days.  We get continued contacts with the embassy and they said they cannot process anything right now, but isn’t the system partially working?” asked Allen Liu, who studies at UCLA, on the State Department’s Consular Affairs Bureau page Thursday morning.

Consular Affairs responded to Liu six hours later: “Hi Allen, it sounds like our colleagues in Luxembourg are aware of your case and doing what they can to assist you and others like you who are anxiously awaiting visas. Thank you for your continued patience.”

Another complainant, newlywed Laura Johnson, also fretted about her travel arrangements.

“As I will miss my honeymoon to Florida now due to this, what’s the best way to get my passport back so at least I can go somewhere else? At the rate the London embassy replies to emails most of the honeymoon time off will be over before I get a proper answer,” Johnson wrote.

“Hi Laura, we are truly sorry that you will not be able to enjoy the honeymoon you’ve planned. We are still issuing many visas, however, at a reduced rate,” Consular Affairs replied.

It’s unusual to see the federal government react so personally -- and relatively quickly -- to individual complaints. But in the interest of damage control, the State Department has to cast a wide net in this case to reduce confusion among people all over the world who might not have much experience dealing with government red tape.

“In addition to communicating through our websites, e-mail and letters, we are also reaching out to applicants via Facebook and other social media sites, such as Weibo [a Chinese microblogging site], to relay the latest information,” according to a Consular Affairs FAQ page on its website.

Plus, the State Department isn’t sure when this problem will be fully resolved. There have been “performance issues” since Consular Affairs performed upgrades on its Consolidated Consular Database, the hub for all visa and passport applications, on July 20, spokeswoman Marie Harf said Wednesday.

“We anticipate it may take some time before we process all of the pending cases created by the performance issue,” she said.

The Consular Affairs bureau is working with Microsoft and Oracle, the makers of the database’s technology, to fix the problem, which it believes is related to outdated hardware and software, as opposed to something malicious like a virus.

Meanwhile, passports are still being processed in a timely fashion. But the glitches prevent embassies from physically printing visas for individuals looking to come to the United States.

For students seeking admission to the U.S. for the fall 2014 semester, which for many colleges starts in August, Consular Affairs is already recommending a Plan B: making arrangements with their school’s administrators for starting their studies after their program begins.

But that was little consolation for Liu, the UCLA student, who wrote back to Consular Affairs on its Facebook page.

“I have my summer course next Monday,” he wrote. “I desperately need the visa as soon as possible.”

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

CMS Official: 'Bumps' Possible in HealthCare.gov Fall Enrollment


ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- Things have gotten better for HealthCare.gov, but there could be “bumps” in this fall’s open-enrollment period for 2015 coverage, a top CMS official told a House Committee Thursday.

“I expect that it won’t be perfect,” CMS Principal Deputy Administrator Andy Slavitt told the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, at a hearing about Affordable Care Act implementation.

“Everybody will remain on their toes,” Slavitt said, noting that CMS is “expecting to have a good open enrollment” period.

ACA open enrollment for 2015 begins this November.

After HealthCare.gov’s troubled rollout, the Government Accountability Office predicted in a study released Wednesday that more problems could loom this fall.

“Unless CMS improves contract management and adheres to a structured governance process, significant risks remain that upcoming open enrollment periods could encounter challenges,” the GAO wrote.

Slavitt cautiously insinuated that enrollment will probably be a lot smoother this time around. He pointed to a “big testing window” for HealthCare.gov and “daily intensive management of the project” this summer.

“I think this year we can expect we’re in a vastly different situation. For one, we have a website that’s already up and live and running,” Slavitt said.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

Seven Congressional Perks Eric Cantor Will Have to Give Up


US House of Representatives(WASHINGTON) -- Former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor is leaving behind one of Washington’s most powerful titles this week as Congress goes on recess, meaning he will have to cope with the loss of many of the advantages that come with being the No. 2 Republican in the U.S. House of Representatives.

The Virginia Republican, who was defeated in his June primary by an economics professor and first-time candidate, will serve out his term in Congress, but he’ll have to do it without any of these perks:

1. The Entourage

Leading the Republican House caucus isn’t easy and Cantor relied on a large staff of dozens in his district office, Washington, D.C. office and leadership office to keep things running smoothly. But now he’s going to have to downsize. The incoming leadership team of Reps. Kevin McCarthy of California and Steve Scalise of Louisiana have already absorbed many of his responsibilities -- and snapped up some of his soon-to-be out of work staffers, according to Politico.

2. Fancy Invites

Even before his successor was named, Cantor lost much of the influence he commanded before losing the support of his constituents. He’ll be in office until January, but as a back-bencher, he shouldn’t expect to lead any more congressional delegations to places like Davos, Switzerland, where he attended the World Economic Forum last January. (He was, however, spotted in the Hamptons after his defeat.)

3. Proximity to Power

Since his defeat, Cantor has been a no-show at press conferences and leadership meetings. He’s also missed a higher percentage of votes since losing his primary than in his previous 14 years of service, according to Roll Call. And another thing: He can kiss goodbye all those coveted photo-ops with House Speaker John Boehner. As Boehner’s No. 2, Cantor had been an ubiquitous presence by the speaker’s side for years, but will now recede into the background.

4. The Attention

Most members of Congress love being in the spotlight (as long as there’s no scandal involved), and few lawmakers were in as much demand as Cantor. That’s all over. However, Cantor’s defeat may actually be a blessing in disguise. He no longer has to brave the scores of reporters around the Capitol seeking comment on his conference’s actions.

5. Mmmmm…Steak

We don’t know for sure if Cantor has seen his last political campaign, but his ouster certainly put a damper on his influence in the party. He has done little stumping for other Republicans since losing his own race -- making the thousand-dollar campaign-expensed steak dinners a thing of the past for now.

6. Office Space

If you wanted to find House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, you could often find him around the House majority leader’s suite on the second floor of the Capitol. Now, the best place to find Cantor will be on the third floor of the Cannon House Office Building, where the Richmond congressman will be serving out the rest of his term in political exile.

7. Bye Bye, @GOPLeader

Cantor passed the social media baton shortly after addressing the House as majority leader for the last time. If you want to tweet at Cantor, you can find him at @RepEricCantor -- @GOPLeader now belongs to McCarthy.

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

'Hispandering:' Is DC's Newest Buzzword Offensive?


Architect of the Capitol(WASHINGTON) -- Washington has never been short of political jargon. The “conversation,” the “narrative,” “filibuster,” and even “sequester” have all seeped into everyday language. But a new word has arrived on the scene, and it’s causing a stir.

“Hispandering,” a portmanteau of “Hispanic” and “pandering,” is a charge that means precisely what it looks like. No one can say exactly who coined the term. Some point to mentions as early as 2002.

The current kerfuffle over “hispandering” started this summer when Republican National Committee Hispanic Media Communications Director Izzy Santa accused Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley of doing it in a recent string of public comments.

Santa accused Hillary Clinton of doing it too.

“Strange thing happened last week, Hillary Clinton in a matter of 24 hours flip-flopped on the 2008 immigration law for trafficking victims,” Santa wrote in an e-mail sent to reporters. Santa pointed out that Clinton had once said she was open to changing the 2008 law, but, the email read, “the next day in front of Univision’s Jorge Ramos, she switched her stance and said she does not support changes to the 2008 law. Hispandering?”

Back in June, the Democratic National Committee’s Director of Hispanic Media Pili Tobar called the word “offensive” -- an assessment she echoed in a follow-up statement to ABC News this week.

“It’s clear that the RNC isn’t interested in finding solutions -- while Republicans keep paying lip service to Latinos and repeating silly phrases that demean the community,” Tobar said.

For her part, Santa said any discussion of the word is pure fluff -- a non-issue.

“‘Hispandering’ is just a word. People use it. It’s not meant to be offensive to the Hispanic community,” she said in an interview with ABC News. “It’s a simple, popular word that is commonly used. As a Puerto Rican myself, if somebody used the term ‘hispandering’ to me, I wouldn’t be offended.”

She added, “I’m sorry that the DNC is not in tune with the Hispanic community and doesn’t realize it’s used very widely, whether in private conversations or in statements issued by the RNC.”

The debate comes at a time when Congress, on the verge of its August recess, is mulling a solution to the flow of migrants across the border. Some Hispanic voices are skeptical of “hispandering,” but say the real question is whether Congress will act on the border crisis and immigration reform.

Bertha Guerrero, director of National Advocacy at the Hispanic Federation, emphasized that “There should be substantive dialogue when it comes to the needs of the Latino community, and I don’t think we should really be using that term.”

Maria Torres, a professor of Latin American and Latino Studies at the University of Illinois at Chicago and Executive Director of the Inter-University Program on Latino Research, advised both sides to correct their approach -- rhetorically and politically: “No group likes to be demeaned or thought about just as a group to be pandered to,” she noted.

But to her, like to Guerrero, the real problem lies in the inaction.

“All these other types of attacks like Republicans attacking Democrats for pandering, or Democrats pointing the finger at Republicans over immigration reform -- all these are sideshows that will alienate the Latino voter. There is a third option, and that’s staying home,” she added. “We need more than just one party correcting the other for being linguistically incorrect.”

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio

Subscribe To This Feed

Boehner v. Obama: House Approves Resolution to Sue President


Official White House Photo by Pete Souz(WASHINGTON) -- In a partisan vote that marks a new escalation in the Republican confrontation with President Obama, the House of Representatives approved a resolution to authorize Speaker John Boehner to initiate litigation against the president over allegations he's repeatedly overstepped his constitutional authority.

At issue is President Obama's changing of the Affordable Care Act law related to its penalty against businesses that do not offer health care to their employees. 

The provision -- and the economic impact from its proposed penalty -- was twice delayed by the Obama administration; critics allege that was done to shield Democrats from blowback at the ballot box. Because of the changes, the provision will now take effect in 2016.

In a floor speech during debate on the bill, Boehner said the vote was not about differences between Republicans and Democrats, but was, "about defending the Constitution that we swore an oath to uphold, and acting decisively when it may be compromised."

"No member of this body needs to be reminded of what the Constitution states about the president's obligation to faithfully execute the laws of our nation. No member needs to be reminded of the bonds of trust that have been frayed, of the damage that's already been done to our economy and to our people," Boehner, R-Ohio, said. "Are you willing to let any president choose what laws to execute and what laws to change?  Are you willing to let anyone tear apart what our founders have built?"

Five Republicans joined a unanimous Democratic Caucus in opposition to the resolution.

Throughout the week, Democrats have complained that Republicans will potentially waste millions of dollars with what they called a "political stunt" that they believe will put the GOP on track to impeach the president.

"This lawsuit is frivolous. It is also wasteful and without merit," Rep. Marc Veasey, D-Texas, claimed during debate on the bill, which he voted against. "We must focus on critical legislative priorities instead of political lawsuits that will do nothing but waste millions of taxpayers' dollars."

Rep. Adam Schiff, who also voted against the measure, questioned whether the House even has standing to sue the president over what he termed "a policy difference."

"The House cannot speak for the Senate which doesn't agree with its position, and, therefore, cannot represent the legislative branch," Schiff, D-California, said during debate on the bill. "This Congress has a remedy: if it does not like the way in which the president has implemented the Affordable Care Act, it can change the law. That would be a far better approach, one more consistent with our separation of powers than this expensive and ill-conceived lawsuit."

Boehner will not bring the matter up for a vote before the Bipartisan Legal Advisor Group, known as BLAG. Instead, the next step will either be the House general counsel either files or hires outside counsel, according to a Boehner spokesman.

According to Boehner spokesman Michael Steel, the speaker and his team, "decided a BLAG vote was unnecessary, after consulting legal experts."

"The BLAG will not have to meet," Steel says. "We have greater standing if it’s an act of the whole House."

A U.S. District Court judge will have the final word whether the House actually has standing to sue the president, but Wednesday's vote to sue the president will almost certainly be one of the recurring soundtracks during the 97-day countdown to the fall elections.

Immediately following the vote, Rep. Greg Walden, the chairman of the National Republican Congressional Committee, sent out a fundraising email with the subject line "Give Obama Hell!" that sought to stimulate 1,500 new grassroots supporters.

The White House, meanwhile, reacted quickly, soliciting email addresses on its website but also making clear that the president will continue to take executive actions if Congress continues to block him legislatively.

"President Obama is ready and willing to work with Republicans in Congress if they decide to get serious and do something for the American people," the statement read. "But he is also committed to acting however he can to help more working families -- even as Congress won't."

Follow @ABCNewsRadio
Copyright 2014 ABC News Radio


Polls
WHAT'S YOUR FAVORITE COUNTRY SUMMER SONG?
ALL SUMMER LONG-KID ROCK
SUMMER'S COMING-CLINT BLACK
SUMMERTIME-KENNY CHESNEY
SUMMERTIME BLUES-ALAN JACKSON
SUNSHINE & SUMMERTIME-FAITH HILL
SIX PACK SUMMER-PHIL VASSAR
Add a Comment
(Fields are Optional)
Name:
Email:
Your email address is never published.
View Results

KJC Kennel Club


 

Click on the Race Car for

The complete Schedule!


HIT'S FM

103.3 TAWAS

94.9 ALPENA 

For schedule, click on pictures!


   
Carroll Broadcasting

 



American
Country Countdown
with Kix Brooks


Saturday Mornings


The WKJC Birthday 
Anniversary
Club

 

Hey if you have
a birthday or Anniversary
 coming up or 
if you know someone who does, why not let Kevin Allen mention it on the air in his morning Show.  Just click on the link below and we will get it on the air!

 

The WKJC Birthday Club


 

 



Carroll  Broadcasting
Mascot!


JET

2007-2009

"Always in our Heart! "

LinkedUpRadio Envisionwise Web Services